Politico has a long article out today about Ben Cardin’s “will he or won’t he?” quandary on the Iran deal.
The exchange underscored Cardin’s quandary as Congress prepares to vote this month. A genial Jewish lawmaker from Baltimore, Cardin represents a mostly liberal state — but one that also includes a sizable Jewish population. He feels the push of a Senate caucus that overwhelmingly backs the Iran agreement — on Tuesday, two more Democratic senators, Chris Coons of Delaware and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, came out in favor of it — and the pull of pro-Israel groups imploring him to reject it.
Only one more senator is needed to dash the GOP’s hopes of blocking the accord. But after the meeting, Cardin refused to say whether he’d be the decisive 34th vote to ensure that a resolution to kill the Iran deal would withstand a veto.
“This is not a clear decision,” said the second-term senator, who became the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s ranking member this spring after Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), a staunch critic of the pact, was indicted. “For those that say it’s a clear decision, I would take exception.”
While I like and respect Cardin in many ways, I am disappointed that he has hesitated for so long on this question. And while I understand that he is wary of the division in the Jewish community, I suspect that the divide is more ideological than just about this bill. And in the Democratic electorate, which is where he would face any meaningful challenge, he would be hailed by most Jews (including me) for doing the right thing and supporting his president. As the article noted, 33 (now 34 thanks to Cardin’s Maryland colleague Barbara Mikulski) Democratic senators support the deal, while only 2 (Schumer and Menendez) oppose it.
Bottom line: whichever way you look at it, this should not be that hard a call for Ben Cardin.